|
|
| Quark or In-Design? | | Quark | | 40% | [ 9 ] | | In-Design | | 54% | [ 12 ] | | Other | | 4% | [ 1 ] |
| | Total Votes : 22 | | |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Kelly Cr Guest
| Subject: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:24 am | |
| | Which do people perfer and why? |
|
 | |
Kelly Cr Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:25 am | |
| | Quark becuase it's what I've always used. |
|
 | |
dumb blo Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:28 am | |
| | In-Design because it works alongside all the other Adobe products, PS and Ill so well, why use an outsider |
|
 | |
Weirdo Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:32 am | |
| | Quark becuase I do a lot of publishing layouts it's better for that |
|
 | |
Toon Admin

Age : 28 Joined : 15 Nov 2006 Posts : 746 Location : Sheffield
| |
 | |
Design G Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:38 am | |
| Q lazy me.
(See what I did? Even a lazy answer) |
|
 | |
brand ne Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:45 am | |
| | Quark haven't got ID but I hear it's quite good |
|
 | |
G5

Age : 21 Joined : 27 Nov 2006 Posts : 97 Location : England
| |
 | |
lucy Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:24 am | |
| | It's all I ever use |
|
 | |
saronyx82

Age : 25 Joined : 30 Nov 2006 Posts : 38 Location : Scotland
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:32 am | |
| | In-Design, for the same reasons as Dumb blonde. |
|
 | |
mickhawkes

Joined : 29 Nov 2006 Posts : 44 Location : Derby, UK
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:20 pm | |
| In-Design for me Mick |
|
 | |
brandnu Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:17 am | |
| Indesign.... and never look back!
Also one or two mishaps and one comes up with some interesting stuff in Indesign. Good for pasting EPS logos straight from AI as a vector. No need to worry about linking them. ..etc.... millions of reason why Indesign pisses all over the Q..... uark... |
|
 | |
thomashuntjr

Age : 27 Joined : 29 Nov 2006 Posts : 7 Location : Stillwater, OK
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:30 pm | |
| | In-Design, I use alot of adobe products and just enjoy the integration in-between them and now that adobe owns macromedia there is more compatibility with flash as well. I know its already been said but why use an outsider |
|
 | |
InspireBox
Joined : 04 Dec 2006 Posts : 7
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:33 pm | |
| | In-Design because its simply superseeded Quark in so many ways in the past couple of years, not to mention the critical importance of its total integration with the rest of the CS2 Suite. It really is an app of dreams, I use it all the time. |
|
 | |
skysport Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:34 am | |
| Quark just because I get so many files supplied in Quark, & a rare file sent in In-design. But I think In-design will take Quark over if more people use it.  |
|
 | |
Tyler Du Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:38 am | |
| | skysportswidow wrote: | | I think In-design will take Quark over if more people use it. |
Agree 100% |
|
 | |
prewe

Age : 22 Joined : 05 Dec 2006 Posts : 204 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:48 pm | |
| | Indesign.. I got scared away from Quark 4 (i think) in school, from then it has been Indesign only. |
|
 | |
flashwiz

Joined : 12 Dec 2006 Posts : 129
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:55 pm | |
| In Design for me too... more than anything as i just feel comfortable using software from the same distributor in the first instance... so it works well with Photoshop and Illustrator etc... but also to be honest it just works better too... _________________ http://www.scandinaviandesigns.co.uk Better to regret something you have done rather than something you didnt do! |
|
 | |
stealth- Guest
| Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:27 am | |
| | Quark here |
|
 | |
|