|
| Quark or In-Design? | | Quark | | 40% | [ 9 ] | | In-Design | | 54% | [ 12 ] | | Other | | 4% | [ 1 ] |
| | Total Votes : 22 | | |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Kelly Cr
Guest
 |  Subject: Quark or In-Design?  Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:24 am | |
| Which do people perfer and why? |
|
  | |
Kelly Cr
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:25 am | |
| Quark becuase it's what I've always used. |
|
| | |
dumb blo
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:28 am | |
| In-Design because it works alongside all the other Adobe products, PS and Ill so well, why use an outsider |
|
| | |
Weirdo
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:32 am | |
| Quark becuase I do a lot of publishing layouts it's better for that |
|
| | |
Toon
Admin
Number of posts: 748
Age: 30
Location: Sheffield
Registration date: 2006-11-15
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:35 am | |
| I've chosen Quark, but again it's only because I'm used to using it, it's laziness really. But the question is a little bit contradictory and Weirdo brushed on it, that Quark is essentially a layout programme and In-Design is a design programme so if I was doing a piece that required any of the extended design elements of in-design I would use that. But for a publication layout Quark is far more the better option. |
|
| | |
Design G
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:38 am | |
| Q lazy me. (See what I did? Even a lazy answer) |
|
| | |
brand ne
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:45 am | |
| Quark haven't got ID but I hear it's quite good |
|
| | |
G5
Number of posts: 97
Age: 23
Location: England
Registration date: 2006-11-27
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:04 am | |
| I've been taught how to use quark, so i know how to use quark properly but i do like indesign more now, because you can do so much more with it. G5 dZine |
|
| | |
lucy
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:24 am | |
| |
|
| | |
saronyx82
Number of posts: 38
Age: 27
Location: Scotland
Registration date: 2006-11-30
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:32 am | |
| In-Design, for the same reasons as Dumb blonde. |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:20 am | |
| |
|
| | |
brandnu
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:17 am | |
| Indesign.... and never look back! Also one or two mishaps and one comes up with some interesting stuff in Indesign. Good for pasting EPS logos straight from AI as a vector. No need to worry about linking them. ..etc.... millions of reason why Indesign pisses all over the Q..... uark... |
|
| | |
thomashuntjr
Number of posts: 7
Age: 28
Location: Stillwater, OK
Registration date: 2006-11-29
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:30 pm | |
| In-Design, I use alot of adobe products and just enjoy the integration in-between them and now that adobe owns macromedia there is more compatibility with flash as well. I know its already been said but why use an outsider |
|
| | |
InspireBox
Number of posts: 7
Registration date: 2006-12-04
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:33 pm | |
| In-Design because its simply superseeded Quark in so many ways in the past couple of years, not to mention the critical importance of its total integration with the rest of the CS2 Suite. It really is an app of dreams, I use it all the time. |
|
| | |
skysport
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:34 am | |
| Quark just because I get so many files supplied in Quark, & a rare file sent in In-design. But I think In-design will take Quark over if more people use it.  |
|
| | |
Tyler Du
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:38 am | |
| | skysportswidow wrote: | | I think In-design will take Quark over if more people use it. |
Agree 100% |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:48 pm | |
| Indesign.. I got scared away from Quark 4 (i think) in school, from then it has been Indesign only. |
|
| | |
Guest
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:55 pm | |
| In Design for me too... more than anything as i just feel comfortable using software from the same distributor in the first instance... so it works well with Photoshop and Illustrator etc... but also to be honest it just works better too... |
|
| | |
stealth-
Guest
| | Subject: Re: Quark or In-Design? Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:27 am | |
| |
|
| | |
|
